• Hey! We're on Twitter!

  • Buy The Book!

  •  

     

    Click to Buy The Mug

    Buy The Book

SRios.jpgRadio gabber and Townhall pundit Sandy Rios was last seen explaining that pro-choice people should stop their sobbin’ about Dr. George Tiller’s murder in the cathedral, because he was an abortion provider and therefore his “church” was obviously a coven of pagans who were only pretending to be Lutherans because of the superior cuisine.  And lucky for us, Sandy brings that same detached and rational style of analysis to this week’s column:

Marriage in  Maine: Why We’d Better Fight

Now that we know what President Obama’s “Safe Schools Czar” Kevin Jennings means by “safe,” we’d better start putting the pieces together on homosexual activism and fight back.

The beautiful old state of Maine faces a battle that will affect us all.

Gay lobsters will come out of the closet, and convert others, and suddenly those wrestling matches in the lobster tank at the front of fancy seafood restaurants will become embarrassingly homoerotic.  Worse, gay lobsters do not breed, they adopt, which will devastate the fishing industry in the Pine Tree State and drive up the price of surf ‘n’ turf all across this once great land.

Will they vote “yes” to maintain traditional marriage on November 3rd or will they not? … If we believe marriage should be between a man and a woman, we’d better mobilize. But marriage is just one piece of this puzzle. Let me tell you why.

Much has been reported about the “Safe Schools Czar,” not the least of which is his desire to “Queer Elementary Education.”  That is the creepy title of the book for which he wrote the forward along with no-longer-underground-Bill Ayers.

Actually, the title is “Queering Elementary Education,” but let’s not quibble.  And William Ayers’ name appears nowhere in the book, which only proves that he not only secretly authored Barack Obama’s autobiographies, but Kevin Jennings’ work as well!  In fact, he’s ghost-writing this post right now.  Sandy’s too.  The guy’s more prolific than Joyce Carol Oates.

And the title actually means what you think it means.

Unless you think it means what Sandy thinks you think it means.

Publisher’s Description:  Queering Elementary Education is not about teaching kids to be gay, lesbian, bisexual, or straight. It’s not part of a sinister stratagem in the “gay agenda.” …Queer teachers are those who develop curriculum and pedagogy that afford every child dignity rooted in self-worth and esteem for others. In short, queering education happens when we look at schooling upside down and view childhood from the inside out. This groundbreaking volume demands we explore taken-for-granted assumptions about diversity, identities, childhood, and prejudice.

The book is filled with child-adult sex

So it’s kind of like the Bible.

including the story of a lesbian mom and her daughter lusting for the same girl in the playground.

The Amazon “Look Inside” feature doesn’t allow access to the entire text, but I didn’t see anything quite so salacious in the table of contents, which mainly features some rather dry and academic-sounding monographs.  But just because Sandy can’t remember the title of the book she’s basing her argument on is no reason to assume she didn’t actually read it.  So just get that silly thought right out of your head.

Homosexual activists have your kids in their sights.

Homosexuals are like Charles Whitman, sitting atop a phallic-shaped tower, peering through a telescopic sight at your children and preparing to pull the trigger on his love gun, love gun.

The next generation is very important to them—and not only for the purposes of propaganda.

Homosexual activists want your children in every way.

To quote Joel Robinson: “I wonder what her Briggs-Myers test looks like.”

In order to achieve that, it is necessary to mainstream homosexuality so that anyone opposing it is severely ostracized or punished as a result. But, of course, we’re there. Matt Barber, while working for All State Insurance, wrote—on his own time—an article opposing homosexuality and was subsequently fired.

Ah yes, Matt “Bam Bam” Barber, Heterosexual Martyr and, like Sandy, a former Concerned Woman for America.  S.Z. adjusted the claims adjuster’s claims when he first made them back in 2005 (scroll down to “Allstate Persecutes Christian”):

Well, if you read further down, our martyr, J. Matt Barber, says that it wasn’t solely because he wrote that column.  He adds that Allstate was actually looking for an excuse to get rid of him because he tattled on his boss’s boss for public displays of affection with a female doctor at a conference in Lisbon. 

“He was a married man,” Barber explained. “It made me very uncomfortable, especially because we investigate sexual harassment.”

And since it made Matt uncomfortable, he filed a sexual harassment complaint against the manager.

Reading the whole post, it’s apparent Allstate fired Matt not for bigotry, but for impersonating a Dilbert character.

Only positive examples of “gayness” have been presented in television, movies and media in order to normalize and de-stigmatize homosexuality.

I’d have thought “crappy internet bulletin board posing as an online magazine” would have qualified as a medium.

Young Americans can hardly remember when or why homosexuality was once taboo.

I hear ya.  I was talking to my 8-year old niece the other day, and it was clear she could barely recollect a world in which Arianism posed an existential threat to Trinitarianism.  Kids today have no appreciation for our struggle.

(By the way, Sandy?  If you think young Americans can’t conceive of homosexuality being taboo, you haven’t talked to an adolescent boy lately.)

After the famous Britney Spears/Madonna kiss there was an epidemic of teenage girls experimenting with lesbianism, kissing in public, emulating their idols for all to see.

Then all those teenage girls married wannabe rappers, shaved their heads, and turned into white trash baby chutes.

Through Gay-Straight Alliance Clubs, established by Safe Schools Czar Jennings and his former organization GLSEN, children—even in grade school—have been encouraged to “come out.”

There’s clearly no need for an organization that seeks to defend at-risk gay youth.

“WASHINGTON, July 8, 2009 – Sirdeaner Walker, the mother of 11-year-old Carl Walker-Hoover, who died by suicide after enduring constant bullying at school, testified today in front of the House Subcommittees on Early Childhood, Elementary and Secondary Education and Healthy Families and Communities on Wednesday in support of the Safe Schools Improvement Act – federal legislation to require that schools adopt anti-bullying policies.”

See?  These little problems have a way of working themselves out.

Gay activists had a plan which they laid out in great detail in a 1989 book called “After the Ball.” And they had help in high places. For over 20 years, the National Education Association has been aggressively pushing homosexuality.

You know, my wife’s a teacher, and those leadbottoms at the NEA have never gotten around to aggressively pushing homosexuality on her.  In fact, they haven’t even gently nudged enough bisexuality on her to inspire a decent chance for a threesome.  What the hell are we paying dues for?

Homosexuality was introduced in every area of the curriculum with American history rewritten to accommodate a “gay” Abraham Lincoln and literature and reading assignments filled with stories of graphic homosexual sex.

Oh boo hoo.  When I was in school we had to read O Pioneers! and what I wouldn’t have given for a literary reach-around during Third Period English…

The teachers were had, or they were silent and the children unprotected and ripe for the picking.

But that’s the kind of work Americans won’t do, so undocumented Mexican homosexuals had to be trucked in to pick the children before they rotted in the field.

Mothers went soft, refusing to believe their own schools were presenting such outrageous materials, while at the same time believing they were being compassionate to the gay community. It was all part of the strategy, after all, helped greatly by presenting sympathetic characters and stories of bullying and brutality to canonize homosexuals as victims in order to get the sympathy of women, who naturally want justice. Matthew Shepard’s death worked beautifully for this

Yes, Matthew was quite the little prankster, but I think even you gals will admit that when he was found beaten and left for dead, crucified on a fence, the joke was on his mother.

Matthew became a cause célèbre and mothers turned their heads from the sexualization of their own children in order to show empathy with gay relatives and friends.

So mothers let their daughters dress up in inappropriately sexy clothing to make homosexuals feel better about gay bashing?

The strategy looks something like this: Sexual orientation laws (protecting homosexuality as equal to race and religion)

Well, that’s an outrage, and such laws should be repealed immediately!  After all, homosexuality and race are innate, but religion is a choice, and if those whiners don’t like being on the receiving end of violence and discrimination, they can simply change their beliefs and worship the god or gods preferred by the majority.

Anyway, you were saying that “[s]exual orientation laws” lead to…?

…lead to hate crimes law (giving uber law enforcement protection to gays, lesbians and transgendered persons) which lead to hate speech laws that eventually silence free speech—even the preaching of pastors in churches.

I love how Sandy’s slippery slope argument is presented as a fait accompli.  It’s so much easier to win a debate when you pretend your outlandish worst case scenario is history, rather than hypothetical.

Using the Bible to teach God’s design for sex expressed only in the union between one man and one woman for a lifetime has become a criminal act in countries where hate crimes and speech laws have been enacted.

Yeah, I’ll worry about that when we also get those countries’ single-payer health care systems.

And that brings us to the marriage debate. It is not unconnected.

You could’a fooled me, sister.

Homosexual activists don’t want marriage. They want the total breakdown of traditional family relationships.

Tell ‘em to relax, the straight folks have that covered.

32 Responses to “Her Name is Rios”

hate crimes law (giving uber law enforcement protection to gays, lesbians and transgendered persons)

I could not quite follow this. Is it a typo? I can only assume that US laws now classify it as a hate crime if an assault with a potato or other root vegetable is motivated by the victim’s gender identification, but she left the ‘t’ off ‘tuber’.

So, by treating gay men and women as human beings, possessing the same rights as any other person, you are in some perverse way actually encouraging gay-bashing? I guess then that the end of Apartheid was also a bad thing – all it did was to encourage racist killings.

I guess that this kind of thinking makes sense in the parallel universe which Sandy Rios inhabits.

And, I am also compelled to ask – where the fuck is Allan Erickson?

He’s probably resting up from the strenuous stoning of his disobedient wife and disrespectful child.

What’s with the shoulder straps on Sandy’s uniform? Is that where she keeps her rubber gloves? She looks a little pinched and drawn, like she’s more afraid of food than she is of butt sex. Maybe a couple of cheeseburgers would mellow her out. Not diagnosin’, just sayin’.

Only positive examples of “gayness” have been presented in television, movies and media in order to normalize and de-stigmatize homosexuality.

Yeah, like in “Miller’s Crossing”, for example.

Or Silence of the Lambs.

When I was in junior high, we called the queer kids faggots and dykes and beat hell out of them, and cornered them in locker rooms to make them suck our cocks, and drew genitals on their art projects, and pissed inside their lockers, and threatened to kill them, and accused them of sexually harassing us, and isolated them until they killed themselves. And we *liked* it!

/grumpy old man

What a kind, compassionate, charming Christian woman Sandy is. I think over the weekend she accidentally set her clock back to the seventeenth century, though. These things happen, I guess.

Also, next time I hear or read about someone — a sober, no-nonsense type of person who isn’t motivated by bigotry so much as simple legal prudence for Gum’s sake — who thinks this gay marriage foofarah is simply too burdensome on the social/religious compact, too complex in its needs and leaves too many pederasts, bigamists and beastiality aficionados out in the cold for it to be a satisfactory remedy for consenting, loving adult couples to marry and have the same legal rights as other consenting, loving adult couples, well, I’ll point them here.

What I really hate are bigots who want so desperately to believe that they aren’t bigots they concoct bullshit scenarios to say, “Sure, I’ve had gay sex and some of my best friends are equally closeted, but seriously, gay marriage? It’s not me being a bigot to oppose it, it’s out of concern of the feelings for the real bigots out there. Where’s your famed “tolerance” now, libs?

Hate them. At least this loser has the courage of her lunatic convictions.

I live in Maine, and the “Yes On 1″ crowd has been flooding the airwaves here with “OMG GAY ACTIVISTS WILL FORCE HOMO NUPS ON YER KIDS IN SCHOOL!!!1!1!!” ads for months now. The Portland Catholic diocese put out collection plates specifically to collect money to campaign in favor of Question 1. Were I a callous person, I would comment snarkily on the subject of a church which covers for child molesters trying to deny the rights of loving, consenting adults. Luckily, I am not that callous.

Seriously though, every poll says this thing is going right down to the wire. If you live in Maine, get out and vote No On 1, with a quickness.

As nearly as I can determine, “homosexual activists” want the same rights everyone else enjoys. And a gay/lesbian lobster in every pot.

So, by treating gay men and women as human beings, possessing the same rights as any other person, you are in some perverse way actually encouraging gay-bashing?

That’s an old one. I remember from my childhood that people of different races ought not to get married, because their kids would get such a rough time from…the people who object to interracial marriage!

It’s kind of a “Look what you made me do” thing. It’s hatred with a bonus helping of lack of responsibility.

“In short, queering education happens when we look at schooling upside down and view childhood from the inside out.”

The book is filled with child-adult sex

Nothing about separating the men from the boys with crowbars, Sandy?

To quote Joel Robinson: “I wonder what her Briggs-Myers test looks like.”

Fuck that! I want to see her Briggs-Stratton test!

After the famous Britney Spears/Madonna kiss there was an epidemic of teenage girls experimenting with lesbianism, kissing in public, emulating their idols for all to see.

And gave a shot in the arm to the hideous Katy Perry song.

Mothers went soft

Sandy seems to have a Furries thing going on…

At least this loser has the courage of her lunatic convictions

And I’d agree with you, Jay B, if that courage extended to her actually facing actual evidence instead of making shit up.

Sixty percent of the problem is it’s too fucking easy to be one of these people.

“I wonder what her Briggs-Myers test looks like.”
Shirley you mean the Voigt-Kampff test.

What’s with the shoulder straps on Sandy’s uniform?
Lemmy said it best: “I really like this jacket, but the sleeves are far too long”.

Using the Bible to teach God’s design for sex expressed only in the union between one man and one woman for a lifetime has become a criminal act in countries where hate crimes and speech laws have been enacted.

Except in the Bible multiple wives and concubines are allowed. So, are we up for that? Well, I am, if that includes multiple hubbies.

reading assignments filled with stories of graphic homosexual sex.

OK, on the off chance that Rios isn’t just making shit up, does anyone know what she’s referring to? Usually I can decode these references and it ends up being “Daddy’s Roommate” or something, but what book has been assigned as required reading anywhere that includes “stories of graphic homosexual sex”?

reading assignments filled with stories of graphic homosexual sex.

I don’t recall reading assignments with any stories of graphic heterosexual sex, for that matter.

We had to go out to the playground to hear ‘em, from our fellow classmates.

I must say the wig helps

I suppose I should check my Bible again, but I don’t remember where in the Book the marriage is “defined”, specially where it is defined as a “union between one man and one woman.”

As far as I remember, marriage in the Bible is more like having lots of wives and fucking some slaves also. But maybe I didn’t get the new edition.

As far as I remember, marriage in the Bible is more like having lots of wives and fucking some slaves also.

There are times I wish I was conservative.

“the children unprotected and ripe for the picking.” Thanks for nothing, Ms. Abstinence-Only !

“… which lead to hate speech laws that eventually silence free speech—even the preaching of pastors in churches.” Hate-speech laws are just gently encouraging them to use their Constitutional right to remain silent ! That right needs to be exercised frequently so that the Second and Third Amendments don’t take its lunch money !

“God’s design for sex expressed only in the union between one man and one woman for a lifetime.” Is that union the Pipefitters Local 666 ? Do they have a hiring hall ?

“God’s design for sex expressed only in the union between one man and one woman for a lifetime.”

I believe I read some time ago on Sadly, No! that Sandy is divorced and recently remarried. One assumes this new union remains chaste, while she continues to fuck her ex-husband. According to God’s design.

“God’s design for sex expressed only in the union between one man and one woman for a lifetime.”

Does Sandy Rios mean that I was supposed to stay married to my never-shoulda-gone-there First Husband From Hell? And thereby missed out on nearly three decades of bliss with the manly Mr. Biscuitbarrel? Well, IOKIYAR–the last letter standing for “Rios,” huh?

Also, Casa Biscuitbarrel is SURROUNDED by Teh Gay on ALL SIDES. Yet all of the Biscuitbarrels remain as straight as uncooked spaghetti. Explain, Sandy. SHOW YOUR WORK.

Only positive examples of “gayness” [...have been presented in television, movies and media in order to normalize and de-stigmatize homosexuality.

Yeah, like in “Miller’s Crossing”, for example.]

Or pretty much anything directed by John Milius.

Ms. Rios looks a bit like the result of a union between Celine Dion and a Skeksis.

The teachers were had, or they were silent and the children unprotected and ripe for the picking.

Since there are just two types of moral-scold wingnuts, we’ll have to wish Sandy is of the type who merely fantasizes obsessively about the behavior she condemns in others, not the type who actually does it.

@Bernoldus –

Be careful what you wish for, it might come true.

The last time I wondered where AE had gone, he told us he was always spying on us, and then joined the next few threads to post dozens, if not hundreds, of copy-and-paste comments along with some rather unoriginal scolding. (Well, really now, what else would you expect?)

So I imagine he will be here any moment now, promising us a path to perdition if we don’t follow his “teachings”.

Allan Erickson will prolly show up on the next post, since it’s about s’Wank

Guys, go to the Queering Elementary Education Amazon page and vote down the reviews that are just complaints about the contents of the book. Since the wingers have been bitching about it, the only review by anyone who READ it is no longer shown on the page! And that review is followed by homophobic comments.

You’ll also find quite the easter egg over there in the reviews. I’ve never known a wing-nut to have a working sense of humor, so I figure it’s an apolitical prankster of some sort.

I wonder if this has anything to do with the psychological phenomenon known as projection:

including the story of a lesbian mom and her daughter lusting for the same girl in the playground.

as opposed to the heartwarming story of the Texas cheerleader and her mother consumed with rage towards the same cheerleading rival… and we all know how that story ended.Moloch Jebus demanded a sacrifice.

Projection with inversion? Is that a thing? Or is it some sort of revulsion towards the idea of anything other than pure spittin’ hatred towards one’s daughter’s playmates rivals for male affection and lucrative marriage offers.

I think I’m the only person on the planet who’s actually READ “After the Ball,” the book that’s the subject of so much right-wing conspiracy-theorist blabbering.

It’s a book about media strategies for pro-equality organizations, written by two public relations guys, and it talks about (gasp!) media strategies! The same ones the right-wing organizations use! (Except they call them “strategeries.”)

Something to say?