• Hey! We're on Twitter!

  • Buy The Book!

  •  

     

    Click to Buy The Mug

    Buy The Book

This just in: Robin of Berkeley has trolls! And not your ordinary trolls; no, she has progressive trolls, the worst kind!

When I started my little blog, it didn’t occur to me that trolls would come out in droves. Why would leftists expend their energies on me?

Aw, you’re just being modest, Robin. After all, you’re a reformed liberal and a licensed psychotherapist!

And why would they subject themselves to scrutiny by a licensed psychotherapist?

Yes, you’d think that knowing that a licensed psychotherapist was scrutinizing their anonymous, hasty, remarks would keep them cowering in shame. But yet they still dare post their unflattering comments. What is this world coming to?

But apparently, numerous trolls have been drawn to me, like venomous bees to honey.

Robin, you routinely diagnose mental illness in the Left while being a nut yourself. You’re a humorless, tone-deaf scold. And you tell the most far-fetched, improbable, entertaining stories about the trials and tribulations of being you. Of COURSE the trolls are going to be drawn to you. You’re their queen!

As a psychotherapist, I can see right through them to who they are and how they operate.

And as a layperson, I can recognize projection (I learned about it from Tucker Carlson).

I wonder to myself: Where do these trolls come from? Where do they live and breed?

Do they write in dank basement rooms while their bedraggled girlfriends (or moms) pick up their dirty shorts? Do they intermix trolling with downloading internet porn? (I’m not being snarky here; I’d bet good money that violent smut gives them endless inspiration.)

Sadly, no. Seriously, I think she’s talking about Sadly, No! readers. (Hey, just joshing with you, Tintin and crew.)

Anyway, as usual, Robin takes a horrific incident from her everyday life (in this, case, somebody disagreeing with her in the comments of her blog), and extrapolates it into an indictment of that part of the country that didn’t vote for Bristol Palin, and ends up in a froth of righteous indignation that this country allows people who think differently from her to even live.

The most hardcore of the leftists seem almost feral, wild, and undomesticated. Many lack even the most rudimentary of social skills; some people may very well be diagnosable on the autism spectrum.

Many militants are devoid of an essential ingredient of being human: empathy.

I’d say something about pots and kettles, but doubt that Robin would realize what I’m talking about, what with her total lack of self-awareness. But really, Robin of all people should refrain from accusing people of a lack of empathy – especially because what she is really saying is, “Somebody posted a comment I don’t like; they must be a feral, evil Socialist/progressive/liberal sociopath to do such a thing, because words can hurt and they don’t even care!”

In conclusion, if you have ever had the impudence to criticize Robin of Berkeley, consider yourself put in your place, you troll, you. She knows where you live!

UPDATE:

I just googled Robin of Berkeley to see if I could anything more about her professional background. I didn’t, but I did find an interesting thread about Robin from a couple of weeks ago in the comments section at the American Spectator.

Here are some excerpts:

D — I used to try and post comments on American Thinker, but my comments were either continuously edited (to their liking) or not printed at all.

G — I was actually asked to be a moderator on that site [...]

It’s funny how I got started.

I wrote a scathing comment about something Robin of Berkeley had written; I believed Robin was a phony, since she had been a die-hard liberal for, like, 40 years – and then suddenly embraced every single conservative principle so thoroughly and articulately that it just smelled wrong. [...] I smelled a rat.

Well, my comment disappeared after about 10 minutes, and I wrote to [American Thinker Publisher and Editor] Lifson to complain. [...]

He actually wrote back to me assuring me that Robin of Berkeley does exist, that she’s a friend of his and he’s physically been in her company several times. [...] A day or so later, I got an email from the chief moderator, who told me she shared my suspicions about Robin and she asked me if I was interested in being a contributor to the moderating team.

http://spectator.org/archives/2010/11/18/pat-me-pat-me

Anyway, G. took the position [insert joke here], but very quickly became disillusioned because of what the job entailed (mainly, deleting or editing all posts critical of the AT columnists, especially Robin), and because of all the behind the scenes power plays and nonsense (“I felt like I had fallen in with a Nazi cult). He added that he suspected that the chief moderator, who had a LOT of vitriol to vent about Robin, was jealous of Robin’s friendship with Lifson.

Make of all that whatever you think appropriate.

42 Responses to “Who’s That Clip-Clopping on Robin’s Bridge?”

Now I’m afraid to comment! I feel Frist-Analyzed!

Are these cyber-stalkers getting paid from a Soros organization?

I see Robin’s given up on looking mentally sound.

Although I rarely give up on people, I have had to conclude that many extreme progressives are not simply choosing to be vicious. They do not know how to restrain themselves.

For instance, a progressive e-mailed me with the following, “Man, you’re really messed up.”

The viciousness leaps right off the monitor, doesn’t it?

Y’know, I used to write for a small political blog. Some FReepers (those paragons of self-control and civility) found it, so I decided to post a few of their choicer comments. After that, they started a thread on me in which several of them accused me and the webmaster of being Red Chinese spies. I guess my point is that Robin should hold off on calling anyone “vicious” until they’re actually accusing her of treason.

The most hardcore of the leftists seem almost feral, wild, and undomesticated.

Yes, we progressives are wholly incapable of empathizing with those on the other side of the aisle. This is in stark contrast to conservative-types such as Robin, who would never stoop so low as to attack their opponents personally or attribute vile motives to them. In fact, here’s how respectful Robin is:

Many lack even the most rudimentary of social skills; some people may very well be diagnosable on the autism spectrum.

This is why they can cavalierly imagine snuffing out Granny, a late-term fetus, or, in fact, anyone who gets in their way.

The more extreme progressives have no impulse control whatsoever. They act more primitively than a wild beast as they beat up opponents and sexually degrade conservative women.

These progressives are engineering a New World Order, which is dark and devolved and completely unlivable.

If they can break up this manic (Democratic) party, there’s hope for this country yet.

Notice how calm and restrained she is as she calls us violent, mentally unwell throwbacks who coolly murder little old ladies.

Her commenters are predictably goofy as well. One of them notes that none of the “hardcore progressives” he knows will maintain eye contact. Which, I’ll admit, it shocking – I’m usually very friendly towards people who think I’m evil.

Yeah, we all need some

I’m staying off her couch.

And why would they subject themselves to scrutiny by a licensed certifiable psychotherapist?

Fixed.

Oh, yeah, she’s “sane”. Probably has the discharge paper to prove it too!

But apparently, numerous trolls have been drawn to me, like venomous bees to honey.

Robin’s knowledge of the natural world matches her psychotherapeutic knowledge.

I think she means like flies to shit.

feral, wild, and undomesticated

I believe it was Freud himself who wrote about the Triple Redundant Complex Complex Complex.

Speaking as a leftist – and therefore, by Robin’s standards, speaking for all leftists – I don’t care what she writes. She’s a barely-functioning-in-society moron, AKA a right-wing commentator.

This is my comment on Robin’s post, the moderator let it through. I wonder how long it’ll last once she logs on in the morning.

Posted by: Twisted_Colour Dec 02, 04:49 AM

——————————————————————————–

Congratulations, Ms. Licensed Psychotherapist. With this post you have successfully erected a sign saying “I’m a monkey in a cage, grab your stick and come poke me.”

That’s some classy licensed psychotherapising.

Robin of Bedlam writes: The most hardcore of the leftists seem almost feral, wild, and undomesticated. Many lack even the most rudimentary of social skills; some people may very well be diagnosable on the autism spectrum.

Feel better now?

Robin of Bedlam writes: But apparently, numerous trolls have been drawn to me, like venomous bees to honey

Wow, dumber than advertised. Strictly speaking, honey is what venomous bees puke.

Pshrinks have to be pshrunk themselves, to get and keep their licenses. If you’re wondering why she’s a psychologist, instead of a psychiatrist, now you know. She would never pass the couch exam, and she fucking well knows it…

So the Left (wasn’t that Norbizness?) is wild, feral, AND undomesticated?
Well Robin is crazy, insane, AND mentally ill.
Just trying to improve the civility in the commonwealth.

And why would they subject themselves to scrutiny by a licensed psychotherapist?

Apparently, Robin was graduated from Dr Bill Frist’s University of Telecommuting Medical College and Infomercial Sales.

But apparently, numerous trolls have been drawn to me, like venomous bees to honey.

I prefer to think of us here at World-O-Crap as frikkin’ sharks with frikkin’ laser beams running down an injured puffer fish, but yours works, too.

As a psychotherapist, I can see right through them to who they are and how they operate.

For heaven’s sake! Look at the money and aggravation we could save! Instead of having full-body scanners, the TSA should just hire Robin! By the way, Robin, that’s not a salami stuffed into my thong…

I wonder to myself: Where do these trolls come from? Where do they live and breed?

*channeling David Attenborough*

The…leftist troll…is a breed unique in nature. When…confronted by…idiocy…it rears up on its hind legs and…laughs.

Do they write in dank basement rooms while their bedraggled girlfriends (or moms) pick up their dirty shorts? Do they intermix trolling with downloading internet porn? (I’m not being snarky here; I’d bet good money that violent smut gives them endless inspiration.)

a) I don’t wear shorts. b) I do the laundry. c) I don’t download porn. d) You’re describing Jonah Goldberg to a T, however…

Sadly, no. Seriously, I think she’s talking about Sadly, No! readers. (Hey, just joshing with you, Tintin and crew.)

As chief perv, I resemble that remark, sir! Martinis at dawn!

The most hardcore of the leftists seem almost feral, wild, and undomesticated.

Only if my Chardonnay is not chilled precisely to 55 degrees. Then I get rabid.

Many militants are devoid of an essential ingredient of being human: empathy.

Says the woman who is the ubermilitant on the ubermilitant Berkley campus..

MMTAP writes: If you’re wondering why she’s a psychologist, instead of a psychiatrist, now you know.

She may well be neither. The state doesn’t license “psychotherapists” per se, but permits certain licensed individuals to call what they are doing psychotherapy.

Assuming Robin is telling the truth (always a dubious proposition, given the wildly incongruous tales of encounters with liberals she spins in her writing), in order to call herself a psychotherapist, in California she must be licensed as one of the following by the Board of Behavioral Sciences:

1) Board Certified Psychiatrists (MDs or DOs with specific training in psychotherapy and psychopharmacology,) 2) Licensed Clinical Psychologists (LCP,) 3) Licensed Clinical Social Workers (LCSW) and 4) Licensed Marriage and Family Therapists (LMFT.)

Since Robin’s something of a lightweight, therapeutically speaking, and LCSW requires the least work and smarts, I’m assuming that’s probably what she is. A Master’s in Social Work, whatever that is, requisite coupla years of supervised psychotherapy and pass an exam.

The Board is charged by the State of California to insure that those licensees guilty of unprofessional or unethical conduct (in or out of practice), or incompetence, are stripped of said license, by the way, which I suspect may be why she posts under a pseudonym.

I’m tempted to ask her on her blog if the California State Board of Behavioral Sciences is aware of her writing on both the blog and the American Thinker, which I think is at the very least stunningly unprofessional, but frankly can’t be bothered.

Come to think of it, I wonder if that’s why Pat Santy (remember her crazy-ass Doctor Sanity blog pieces?) hadda split her job, leave town and shut her blog down.

But apparently, numerous trolls have been drawn to me, like venomous bees to honey.

One wonders how venomous bees are drawn to honey any differently than non-venomous ones are. Or for that matter raccoons or porcupines or bears, they’re attracted to honey and certainly aren’t venomous. Well, most bears anyway… Andrew Sullivan can be kinda catty sometimes. But still.

Chris, you can be a CSW and practice in NY. I presume it’s the same in CA, no “L” required.

“I don’t download porn.
As chief perv…”
Left by actor212

As chief perv, shouldn’t you be downloading at least a little bit of porn? You know, just to keep up appearances?

The most hardcore of the leftists seem almost feral, wild, and undomesticated.

Being “leftist” myself, let me assure you it’s just that I have no patience and zero tolerance for blathering fucktards, Robin.

actor212: I don’t download porn.
As chief perv…

Kanzanian: As chief perv, shouldn’t you be downloading at least a little bit of porn? You know, just to keep up appearances?

Why? He’s already got it all. (How else do you get to be chief perv?)

Beware the Nietzchean Abyss: if you follow Robin of Berkeley Hunt for too long, you start to think L. “Da-Do-Ron” Ron Hubbard might have had a point.

Actor212 writes: Chris, you can be a CSW and practice in NY. I presume it’s the same in CA, no “L” required.

It’s not, although California permits what is referred as an Associate Clinical Social Worker (intern, sort of) to practice psychotherapy, sort of, under the supervision of a licensee (you have to do this in order to get those two years of experience under the belt), and then the exam, before licensing.

You can read a brief summary of California requirements here.

Twisted Colour, you’ll be amsused to learn that your comment is still up– and still last– as of 4pm Thu 2 Dec.

I’ll be damned if I’ll register at American Thinker just to post a comment, so since you have, maybe you’d be kind enough to share my question upthread with Robin and her readers.

A psychotherapist is anyone who says “I’m a psychotherapist”. If they’re not claiming to be a licensed professional, like Chris outlines above, they’re in the clear. But if they’re implying some sort of licensed professional standing, they are gonna get got.

Anyway, who calls herself “Robin of Berkeley”? It carries a whiff of Specialness (like “psychotherapist”), a kind of Days of Yore spin. I am Robin, Robin of Sherwood Forest. Robin of Hood. Feh.

paging dr. phil, stat

Larkspur writes: A psychotherapist is anyone who says “I’m a psychotherapist”. If they’re not claiming to be a licensed professional, like Chris outlines above, they’re in the clear.

Again, if they put that on a business card or hang it on a shingle without the licensing described in California they are committing fraud. Here’s an excerpt from the backgrounder I linked to that fleshes this out a bit:

There seems to be an unlimited and ever-growing varieties of activities called “therapies” available in our culture. The word suggests that these are activities that help heal, cure or develop a person. While
literally anything called a “therapy” may be useful to some of the people some of the time, the specific term, “psychotherapy” differs in some ways.

In the state of California (and perhaps in others) the use of the word to describe one’s activities, are legally limited to those with specific training and state licensure.

There are four professional categories and four only, of people who are permitted to use the term ‘Psychotherapy’ or “Psychotherapist’ to describe themselves of what they do. These four groups are 1) Board Certified Psychiatrists (MDs or DOs with specific training in psychotherapy and psychopharmacology,) 2) Licensed Clinical Psychologists (LCP,) 3) Licensed Clinical Social Workers (LCSW) and 4) Licensed Marriage and Family Therapists (LMFT.)

There is no legal restriction on anyone doing literally anything calling themselves a ‘therapist.’ The “Psycho” in Psychotherapist is different. It is important for consumers to understand this and for people offering help to operate within the definitions of the laws in the State in which they work.

My brain insists on reading the phrase as “Robin of Berkeley, Psycho the Rapist.” I’m sure it’s just a phase I’m going through.

There are four professional categories and four only,…

“..and four is the number of the counting. Three shall you not count, excepting that you then proceed to four, neiwther shalt you count five. Six is RIGHT OUT.

When thou counts four, being the fourth number be reached, lobbest thou the Holy Licensure Writ in the general direction of thy foe [Robin of Berkeley], who, not being in my sight, shall snuff it.”

As chief perv, shouldn’t you be downloading at least a little bit of porn?

I’m more a provider than customer…

A psychotherapist is anyone who says “I’m a psychotherapist”.

Hey! I’m a psycho therapist! Kewl!

My brain insists on reading the phrase as “Robin of Berkeley, Psycho the Rapist.” I’m sure it’s just a phrase I’m going through.

Fixed yer post for ya.

actor 212: >i>Hey! I’m a psycho therapist! Kewl!

I’m a psycho, therapist.

From Mentis’ link;

“However, in more advanced Scientology studies, members read a Scientology bulletin called “Pain and Sex”, which states that sex is unnatural for humans and a perversion, and that sex was invented by psychiatrists millions of years ago to trap us.”

Ummm…..
Sounds like this guy’s almost as nutty as the Ron-ettes…

Okay, so Robin of B. must stay anonymous, or else change her appellation to something like Robin of Berkeley, Life Enrichment Therapist, or Therapeutic Guided Imagery Specialist, or Coach of Coaches, or Emissariesse of the One True G-d.

Huh. If you call yourself a licensed psychotherapist, and even have a shingle that says so, but you never ever have a single patient or client, will California have a problem with you?

And why would they subject themselves to scrutiny by a licensed certifiable psychotherapist?

Fixed.

Fixed even better.

Last add:

Used to have a friend named Mike who insisted everybody call him “Psycho” which we were willing to do. He had an abiding fondness for younger women and found himself afoul of the law for having his way with an underage female whose parents took umbrage. When he went to have his driver’s license renewed, he found himself looking at Robin of Berkeley, who worked for the DMV back then. You can guess what happened next:

Robin of Berkeley licensed Psycho the rapist.

God I hate myself.

If you call yourself a licensed psychotherapist, and even have a shingle that says so, but you never ever have a single patient or client, will California have a problem with you?

ah, the zen koan of if a tree falls in the forest and hits Robin of Berkeley in the head, will anyone be able to tell the difference?

I’m friends with a LCSW who is part of a family clinic in a relatively poor, semi-rural part of her state. She works like a dog; the clinic gets truly bad family situations referred to them by state and local agencies, and is not well funded (surprise). The job circumstances – the amount of ability and work required, the toll exacted – of Clinical Social Worker/Therapists must vary a great deal.

Just thought I’d stick up for my pal, who resembles R of B like Fred W. Friendly resembles Glenn Beck. I know Chris was just making a very general remark.

OMG, Chris, I love how you hate yourself.

Also, a LCSW probably saved my life.

There’s a lot to be said for the concept of age quod agis — do what you’re doing. Whatever you do, do it the best you can. A LCSW doing her job totally outranks a cynical or substandard PhD, in my book, even though the money might say otherwise.

As chief perv

Did Ed Meese die and no one told me?

I am well rebuked, and apologize.

I agree with you both on the value of the LCSW, and deeply regret my careless remarks above, which equated those to incompetence.

That said, thanks for helping me to make up my mind about something which has been troubling me for the last couple months: whether to pursue the issue of Robin’s blather with the Board that licenses her.

She gives the whole concept of helping people sort through their problems a bad name, and that’s the whole purpose of the state licensing: to insure that you’re dealing with someone competent to do so.

In Robin’s case, as I said, her writing is both unprofessional and a compelling case for incompetence. She can keep writing, as far as I’m concerned, but if she is practicing psychotherapy all over my nice clean state, it really should stop.

Strongly worded letter to the California State Board of Behavioral Sciences to follow.

“However, in more advanced Scientology studies, members read a Scientology bulletin called “Pain and Sex”, which states that sex is unnatural for humans and a perversion, and that sex was invented by psychiatrists millions of years ago to trap us.”

If lovin’ you is wrong, I don’t wanna be right-minded.

Something to say?