• Hey! We're on Twitter!

  • Buy The Book!

  •  

     

    Click to Buy The Mug

    Buy The Book

Archive for October 2nd, 2006

Q.E.D.

Posted by s.z. on October 2nd, 2006

Please follow this chain of logic and tell me where I made a mistake:

Although Bob Woodward claims that on July 10, 2001, George Tenet and his counterterrorism deputy were so alarmed about an impending Al Qaeda attack that they demanded an emergency meeting at the White House with Condi Rice and her National Security Council staff, Condi cam’t recall such a meeting, and finds it ”incomprehensible” that she would have received such a warning and then failed to respond to it.  So, no such meeting could have occured.

However, White House records confirm that this meeting did take place (“Records Show Tenet Briefed Rice on Al Qaeda Threat – New York Times.”

And, as her 9/11 commission statement indicates, Condi took no action agasint a possible attack except to “continue pursuing the Clinton administration’s efforts.” (And, as we all know, Clinton didn’t do anything at all to counter al Qaeda because he was too busy fooling around with Monica.  And as we further know, only George Bush has done anything to keep you safe, because he’s the Steely-Eyed Rocketman, and Terror is his middle name.)

Therefore Condi was warned, but did nothing. 

But that’s incomprehensible! 

So, I guess the only thing we can conclude is that we live in a surreal universe where nothing makes sense, and George Bush is President of the United States of America.

So, It’s Really MY Fault

Posted by s.z. on October 2nd, 2006

What would a nasty sex scandal be without Rush “LImp Dick” Limbaugh’s input? 

 Are Liberals Truly Offended by Foley?

I have to admit, my friends, I’m a little confused about certain aspects of the situation here involving Mark Foley and the page. [...]

Now, the liberals also tell us that sex and gender issues are just lifestyles, not choices. Maybe choices in the case of sex changes like the chopadickoffame and the adadictomy, but these are just lifestyle things, gender and so forth, we’re not to condemn. Any two people can love each other, any four people can love each other. You can define your family however you want, including your animal or animals. This we have been taught by the tolerant left among us. Kids can have sex, too. Not with somebody just in their age-group, alternative lifestyles, but not if the person is sexually active but younger, apparently. So we find here that there are limits. There are things that will offend liberals. Or are there? Because I continue to ask, are they really offended by this? How many of them wish they were in on the action?

Well, Rush certainly has my number — I’m not really offended that Foley sent sexually explicit IMs to a teen for whom he was an authority figure, nor am I actually outraged because the House leadership did nothing to protect the children for whom they had responsibility.  No, I’m just jealous because I didn’t get some of the action myself — I was really hoping to have any orgy with a few underage pages of both sexes, several animals, and a few creepy middle-aged congressmen, and I’m taking out my frustration and disappointment on Foley and Hastert.

That’s Our Hindrocket!

Posted by s.z. on October 2nd, 2006

Leave it to Hindrocket to come up with the perfect defense for Dennis Hastert: PredatorGate is all the gays’ fault, since one expects homosexuals to do creepy stuff with the pages, and so one can’t blame Hastert for failing to take any action to protect the underage boys employed by the House from Foley.

These emails were described to Hastert, apparently, as “over friendly,” but he was also told that the family of the page in question “didn’t want the matter pursued.” I’ve never been Speaker of the House, but I can imagine that such a conversation would not be among the most significant Hastert has had in the last year, and would not necessarily make a deep impression. Foley was, I take it, generally assumed to be gay.

Yeah, it was probably just another “been there, done that” moment for Hastert when he was told that a member of the House was hitting on the pages.  Because, you know, he believed that Foley was gay, and you know what they’re like.

Our younger readers may not be aware that House pages have figured in several scandals over the years. Congressman Gerry Studds (D-MA) had an affair with a teenage male page that, I believe, included sex within the precincts of the Capitol Building. Studds refused to admit that he had done anything wrong, and turned his back on the House when it censured him for this misconduct in 1983. The voters in Studds’s district didn’t seem to mind; they continued to re-elect him until he retired in 1996. He is remembered mainly as a pioneering crusader for gay rights.

Then there is Barney Frank, who was reprimanded by the House for using his Congressional office to intervene on behalf of his boyfriend, a homosexual prostitute, to dispose of at least 33 parking tickets. The boyfriend also ran a prostitution ring out of Frank’s house. Today, Frank is one of the most powerful members of the Democrats’ House caucus.

Translation: “If you are young or stupid or something, I can probably convince you that the Democrats are way more perverted than the Republicans!  And while my stated thesis was that pages have figured in lots of (Democratic) House scandals, you’ll notice that I only mentioned one such scandal, and that the Barney Frank story didn’t involve any pages at all.  But hey, Frank was gay and Foley is probably gay, so now we’re even.”

So I’m not particularly surprised that Foley wrote some “over-friendly”–I’m sure I would find them creepy–emails to one or more underage pages.

Yes, Hindrocket isn’t particularly surprised that Foley wrote ”over-friendly” or even pornographic emails to the underage pages, because, after all, Foley was gay and in Congress.  So, in conclusion, Remember the Clenis!  And anyway, nobody would even care about about protecting kids from Republican pedophiles if there wasn’t an election next month.

Mr. T’s Action Figure Guide to L.A.

Posted by scott on October 2nd, 2006

 I pity the fool who doesn’t click this link.