• Hey! We're on Twitter!

  • Buy The Book!

  •  

     

    Click to Buy The Mug

    Buy The Book

Archive for December 1st, 2006

I Know Why the Caged Bird Craps on the Op-Ed Page

Posted by scott on December 1st, 2006

Elder care obligations have kept me on the run this week, but I see that Jonah Goldberg left his mark on the Los Angeles Times Opinion page yesterday.  So did my parakeet, but Jonah clearly outperformed her by managing to cover twice as many column inches while still working with the same basic materials.

ONE THOUSAND three hundred and forty seven days.

Jonah’s head has now officially been up his ass longer than America was involved in World War II.

That’s how long the United States was involved in combat in World War II, and Monday, the U.S. passed that “grim military milestone,” as one TV anchor called it. This factoid has become a fixture of respectable talking points about the futility of the Iraq war. Newscasters and pundits note its gravity with sober foreboding and slight head-shaking.

The only thing they don’t note is the grotesque stupidity of the comparison.

And when Jonah wants to talks about “grotesque stupidity,” it’s like a bearded sea captain in a yellow sou’wester who wants to tell you about his 3 Way Chowder and Bisque Sampler.  Trust the Gorton’s Fisherman.

Let us start with the obvious. World War II may have lasted 1,347 days, but it cost the lives of 406,000 Americans and wounded 600,000 more. Losses among Allied civilians and military personnel stretched into the tens of millions. Whole cities were razed, populations displaced, economies shattered.

All that and it still took less time than George Bush’s Outward Bound excursion to Baghdad.

The number of U.S. military deaths in Iraq remains much less than 1% of our WWII losses.

Amazing!  Unless you continue with the obvious, and observe that we have roughly 135,000 troops in Iraq, while there were over 16 million men and women in the Armed Forces during World War II.

World War II ended when the United States dropped two atomic bombs on Japanese cities, killing hundreds of thousands of civilians. Were it not for those grave measures, the war might have lasted for another year or two and cost many more lives. So maybe those wielding the WWII yardstick as a cudgel would prefer we gave Sadr City and Tikrit the Hiroshima-Nagasaki treatment?

Well, Jonah promised grotesque stupidity, but I have to say, he delivered well beyond my wildest dreams.  This is the H-Bomb of Strawman Arguments, and earns the coveted Order of the Wicker Man with Screaming Christopher Lee Cluster:

That would surely root out even the most die-hard insurgents and shorten the war.

Yeah, I can’t see any of the other Sunni and Shiite communities in the region getting all worked up just because we expunged a couple of Sunni and Shiite cities in Iraq with nuclear weapons.  Tony Snow might have to take a little chin music at the next presser, but I predict it would be a 24 hour story, tops.

The phase of the Iraq war that was comparable to World War II ended in less than three weeks.

That would the phase where we weren’t sucking like Jeff Gannon on an overbooked holiday weekend.

Remember “shock and awe”?

Yeah.  Principally, I remember that it sounded pretty stupid.  But now – and I gotta admit, props to Jonah – it sounds grotesquely stupid.

As far as such things go, the conventional war put WWII to shame.

Yeah, all the Allies had to do in WWII was to fight a multi-front war spanning the globe from Scandinavia to the South Pacific.  In Iraq, we had to fight our way from Kuwait City to Baghdad, a distance of 344 miles!  (And it sounds even more impressive when you count it in kilometers!)

the U.S. military victory was akin to defeating all of Italy in less than a month.

Wellll…If you don’t count the fact that Italy was muddy, mountainous, and defended by both Fascist troops and a well-equipped, battle-hardened German Army that didn’t collapse at the first sound of gunfire, then yeah.  Sure.

The current phase of the Iraq war — whether we call it post-occupation, reconstruction, civil war or whatever — is really a separate war.

Donald Rumsfeld’s greatest innovation:  The Modular War.  Today…Iraq.  Tomorrow…Ikea!

It’s at once a Hobbesian nightmare in which chaos rules as well as a complex, multi-front battle between various regional factions and their proxies.

I can see why Jonah is so prone to defend it.  Who wouldn’t want to hop on some of that sweet action?

But as insurgencies go, it hasn’t lasted very long at all or cost very many American lives.

At least, it hasn’t killed any of the people Jonah meets for crumble cake and vanilla mocha lattes at Starbucks.

The man who probably deserves the most credit for the low number of American deaths in Iraq is Donald H. Rumsfeld. The outgoing Defense secretary decided from the outset that U.S. forces would have a “light footprint” and would opt for surgical efficiency over the kitchen-sink approach that characterized World War II.

Jonah has a point.  If there’s one gripe I have with our strategy in WWII, it’s that we simply had too many men.  It wasn’t sporting, and it made us look like big insecure bullies.  Imagine how much more respectfully the Nazis would have received us if, instead of rolling into Germany with 3 separate armies and millions of troops, we’d tried to occupy them with, say, 150,000?  Now that would have been a fight!  Face it, people like to get their money’s worth; nobody likes a knockout in the first round.  And if we’d only followed the Rumsfeldian “light footprint” doctrine, why, we might still be fighting the Nazis today.  Just imagine the pay-per-view possibilities!

Rumsfeld’s way is better, at least on paper.  All else being equal, it’s better to have a long war with fewer casualties than a short war with more of them. That’s why the World War II comparison is so frivolous: Days don’t cost anything, lives do.

Except when we’re losing 2 or 3 or 4 lives per day, every day we stay in Iraq.  But who cares?  Sands through the hourglass, and all that.

Given the enormous scope of World War II, it was a remarkably short war. (Just think of the Hundred Years War by comparison.)

Given the enormous amount of traffic it carries, Fifth Avenue is a remarkably short street.  (Just think of the Pan-American Highway.  Or the distance from the Sun to Uranus.)
 

(Okay, I admit, now I’m just cherry-picking the juiciest fruits of stupidity.)

Indeed, when partisans claim that the American people are fed up and want our troops home, they’re deliberately muddying the waters.

Which Jonah objects to on principle, except when he’s using your Jacuzzi.

The American people have never objected to far-flung deployments of our troops. We’ve had soldiers stationed all over the world for decades.

Not getting shot at and blown up on a daily basis, but still…They’re definitely out of earshot.

What the American people don’t like is losing — lives or wars. After all, you don’t hear many people complaining that we still have troops in Japan and Germany more than 20,000 days later.

Even though you can’t get from Tempelhof to the Unter den Linden without your taxi getting hulled by a .50 sniper rifle or dismantled by an IED, people still support our occupation of Berlin.  See?  It’s all just a matter of perspective.  Grotesquely. Stupid. Perspective.

Sociological Research the Stossel Way!

Posted by s.z. on December 1st, 2006

John Stossel’s latest episode of TV “investigative journalism” has revealed that liberals are cheap. Here’s the Corner’s Jack Fowler to distill the Stossel wisdom into one paragraph:

Liberals Are Cheap! [Jack Fowler]

John Stossel’s 20/20 special last night – “Cheap in America” – was a great program, as usual for him, and had a wonderful segment comparing charitable giving between Red and Blue states, pitting Salvation Army bell-ringers in San Francisco (in front of a Macy’s) versus Sioux Falls, SD (in front of a Wal-Mart). At the end of the day, the folks in Sioux Falls’ had given twice as much money as Nancy Pelosi’s constituents. More of Stossel on conservative generosity/liberal cheapness here.

And by going to “here,” we can learn how John himself explains his research methodology:

To test what types of people give more, “20/20″ went to two very different parts of the country, with contrasting populations: Sioux Falls, S.D. and San Francisco, Calif. The Salvation Army set up buckets at the busiest locations in each city — Macy’s in San Francisco and Wal-Mart in Sioux Falls. Which bucket collected more money?

Well, Jack already revealed the surprise, but it’s clear that Stossel’s little experiment conclusively proved that liberals are cheap – after all, there’s no other explanation for why a bell-ringer in Sioux City would collect more than one in San Francisco . . . except that maybe San Franciscans objected to the religious discrimination the Salvation Army practices against its employees, and so chose to give their charitable contributions to other groups. Or maybe the San Franciscans give their contributions to the SA via payroll deduction or generous checks mailed to the regional office, and didn’t give anything more to the bell-ringer because they don’t carry around cash. Or any of a number of other reasons.

But considering these variables wouldn’t help Stossel to do what he set out to do: prove that it’s a big, stupid myth that liberals “care more about the less fortunate” than conservatives do.  After all, that’s what makes great TV.

Anyway, tune in next time when Stossel will demolish the myth that liberals are smarter than conservatives by stopping passers-by outside the Macy’s in San Francisco and the Hooter in Midland, Texas, and quizzing them on NASCAR trivia.

More Marley

Posted by s.z. on December 1st, 2006

Bob’s the one in the hat.

During our sporadic Fox News viewing on Wednesday we didn’t happen to catch our new friend Bob “an undigested bit of beef, a blot of mustard, a crumb of cheese, a fragment of an underdone potato” Marley’s appearance there. So, we did a Google News search, and learned all we needed to about his Christmas Crusade.

Marley’s appearance there. So, we did a Google News search, and learned all we needed to about his Christmas Crusade.First, from Catholic Online, we found out why he has the time to post comments to our obscure blog:

Massachusetts developer Robert Marley, his brother and a friend were incensed by last year’s efforts to neutralize Christmas. This year, he put his construction business on hold to create the Committee to Save Christmas in Massachusetts – a regional group that is trying to remind retailers of the reason for the season.

While we applaud Bob’s sacrifice, we do have to say that making prank phone calls to Best Buy is a lot easier than working construction … or, you know, working at anything.

But here’s more, from the North Shore TownOnline:

Locally, three Lynnfield guys are leading the charge to take back Christmas. Brothers Robert and Kevin Marley and their business partner Steve Ciambelli have started the Coalition to save Christmas in Massachusetts.

“It’s very simple,” says Kevin Marley. “We’re talking about saving our traditions.”

The Marleys and Ciambelli, who call themselves just regular guys, have done something a little irregular. They have made the malls and shopping centers across the state the front line on the fight for Christmas.

[…]

“What makes this so offensive is this is a deliberate attack on Christmas,” says Robert Marley.

Yes, Bed, Bath, & Beyond, your “Happy Holidays” is a deliberate attack on Christmas, and therefore, a deliberate attack on Christians like Bob.  Oh, the humanity!  This must be the kind of persecution that the Bible predicted would afflict the saints in the last days – but who knew it would be so ugly!

“What’s next?” asks Robert Marley. “Do you shoot the Easter Bunny?”

Just to be safe, the Bunny better pack heat come spring.

But back to the Christmas Crusaders.

 ”We’re not activists,” says Ciambelli, although the three are a little taken by the all the attention their coalition and Web site has drawn.

And they probably went on Fox News just to express their consternation at all the attention.

What is comes down to, what it’s all about for the Marleys and Ciambelli, is saving Christmas and all its traditions for their families and for their kids.

 ”How does everything get changed right under our noses?” asks Kevin Marley, who points out that not only has the assault on Christmas been gradual and steady, it’s come at a time when we’ve learned, sometimes the hard way, that we have to be respectful and tolerant of other faiths and traditions.

And the Marleys and Ciambelli want to know how that all works out to something fair.

“What about the tolerance for us?” asks Robert Marley. “Why do we have to tolerate everyone else when no one wants to tolerate Christmas?

It’s sad that nobody in the whole state of MA will tolerate these three guys, or their holiday (an obscure celebration called “Christmas”) — especially after they’ve had to tolerate everyone else for so long (and some of their fellow Massachusettsians are real jerks)!. So, to make it up to the Crusaders, instead of just instructing all their employees to wish them an “EXTRA Merry Marley and Ciambelli Christmas, with sugar on it,” the stores should probably give these brave men some free stuff — you know, to compensate them for all the pain and suffering they experience by being lumped in with everyone else who was celebrating a holiday this season when it came time to extend to them a perfunctory and insincere commercial greeting.

“Please, just give us back our day.”

Um, Bob, it’s JESUS’S day. Get your own birthday.

 

But actually, Bob isn’t the nuttiest guy quoted in these pieces. That would be Fox News’s John “I’m Not O’Reilly” Gibson.

“I used to call those opposed to Christmas ‘secularists,’ but the shadows have become clearer,” said Gibson, who authored the 2005 book, The War on Christmas. “These are angry atheists. They have had it with believers. They don’t want to talk to them, listen to them or be on the same side as believers.”

“Groups like the American Civil Liberties Union said that Christmas could be celebrated in the homes of Christians and their churches,” said Gibson. “The implication was that it shouldn’t be celebrated in public. If the faithful are interested in this, they ought to look at the wider picture. This is an organized bunch. Heads-up, believers, they are coming after you.”

Heads-up, believers, you’d probably emulate the Easter Bunny (and Dr. Mike, Ph.D.), and get a big bunch of Christmas guns.  After all, this is WAR, and it’s either you or that teenaged Target clerk!