• Hey! We're on Twitter!

  • Buy The Book!

  •  

     

    Click to Buy The Mug

    Buy The Book

Archive for October 6th, 2006

My Prediction: He’ll be Pastor Swank in Another 50 Years

Posted by s.z. on October 6th, 2006

On the grounds that we can’t have too many aging rightwing teen columnists telling us what the Foley Affair really means, let’s now turn the floor over to Hans “Last Defender of the Boy Scouts” Zieger, who will explain that what’s really going on here is “The death of manliness.”

Mark Foley is a sick man in a sick culture. He apparently was abused by a priest as a child, and then he, too, abused House pages (how extensively is uncertain) before it ruined him. By the way, as his attorney affirmed on Tuesday, Mark Foley “is a gay man.”

Aside from the political tides generated by Foley’s resignation, there are much larger cultural tsunamis swashing round.

Hans, don’t you mean, “swishing around”?

The Foley scandal intensifies the strain on relationships between youth and adults. It is particularly damaging for relations between old men and young men, or between men and boys, or between young men and boys. [...]

But why must we be suspicious of men in this age more than in others?

Yeah, it’s the damned boys that we should be suspicious of, because they seem to be the constant in this equation.

Because related immediately to the problem between adults and youth is the problem of homosexuality. [...]

The Boy Scouts insist that their policies banning homosexuals and their policies to prevent pedophilia are separate, but there is an evident link between homosexuality and pedophilia. When I made this claim on Penn and Teller’s Showtime Network program, Penn Gillette shot back with a mountain of profanity, because there really can be no substantial answer to the charge.

How dare Gillette fail to provide a substantial answer to Hans’s unsubstantiated charge that there is an “evident link” between homosexuality and pedophilia?

Men who determine to have sex with other men find an easy target with boys.

Just like men who determine to have sex with women find an easy target in six-month old girls. Sure, some heterosexuals might claim that not all of them are attracted to babies, but there can be no substantial answer to my charge.

In the absence of manliness — of strength, virtue, courage — men find open seasons for gratification, and then boys find an open route to Gomorrah,

Or gonorrhea

especially if that route is advertised enthusiastically by a conspiracy of cultural influences. The route then is a rout — from marriage, from family, from community, and not least from God.

I suppose I should challenge Hans’s unwarranted claims, but I come not to rebut him, I come to admire his purple prose. So, let’s skip over his claim that “It is not merely that there are fewer persons of homosexual orientation, but that there are none,” and go straight to his dramatic conclusion:

Thus lies manhood perverted on the grounds of the nation. It knows no purpose. It cannot defend itself; it cannot defend the ladies. Uninstructed in beauty and maturity, it preys upon innocence and childhood. But it is castrated. The best it knows to do is to check itself, like Mark Foley, into a clinic in hopes of some recovery. Yet real manliness does not dwell within a rehab center, or in Congress, and just where it does dwell is now a challenge to know. The simple quiet of manliness is drowned by the metallic screams and the roars and the hideous emotive sighs of deranged wimps, if indeed it is manliness down there beneath it all.

When we read that, I think we all shed a tear for poor, perverted, castrated manliness, lying there on the ground of the nation, being drowned by the metallic screams of deranged wimps.

At least, I know I did.

Tales from an Alternate Universe

Posted by s.z. on October 6th, 2006

This week Bill O’Reilly uses his column to toot Roger Ailes’ horn (so to speak) on the occasion of Fox News’s 10th birthday – but happily, no falafels were injured during the making of it.

Hollywood put out a hit movie about FNC, liberals like Howard Dean openly disparaged the network, and the far-left blogs did everything they could to damage those working at the network. It was, and is, very nasty.

Yes, the network was, and is, very nasty – but I hear that some of the weather bimbos are actually quite nice.

But think about it; what is the beef? Even if FNC is a conservative think tank, which it is not,

Wait, Fox News isn’t a think tank! Bill, are you sure about this? [sarcasm sequencer set at maximum]

there are five other networks that give enormous benefit of the doubt to the left. So what if one operation leans right? Shouldn’t there be room in this country for one newsroom that doesn’t think like Ted Turner?

Sure. But would it be too much to ask that said newsroom not think like Karl Rove?

Last week on my program, I challenged Democratic strategists James Carville and Paul Begala to give me one example of an unfair presentation on FNC. They could not cite one.

Proof positive that Carville and Begala should be put out to pasture for their own good. (Assuming that Bill isn’t lying about this, which has been known to happen from time to time, assuming you define “time to time” as “every hour or so.”)

The liberal Alan Colmes balances the conservative Sean Hannity, and the rest of the FNC cast is evenly split between the right and the left. The guest list is the same way.

Okay, we’re going to have to stop here, because my laughing is getting in the way of my typing. But instead of asking Bill what color the sky is in his world, I think we can all assume that it’s a patriotic blood red, and then quietly cut his mic and up his medication.